Often when encased in a Vortex World, one is reprimanded for speaking out in what is perceived as dissent. By reprimanded, I mean frowned upon by others with a look of pain or one of displeasure. The step beyond that is being avoided in the hallway the next time you show up to an event. But for those who don't act like children and take a chance at conversing with you since they can't avoid you, you may find yourself privy to a mild passive aggressive lecture on how negative murmering isn't healthy and how we need to uphold and support our leaders so to be a good example for those who are younger in the faith than we are. Even if a simple question is posed about the questionable behavior of the Vortex Leader, eyebrows are slightly raised or eyelids lowered and something is mumbled about how it doesn't really matter since those types of decisions aren't any of our concern. All in all, any form of question is perceived as rebellion, going against the flow, and making life uncomfortable for the Vortex Community. After all, nobody likes a wet blanket or a whiner. Unfortunately, no one really wants to see the truth.
However, once you HAVE disembarked from the Vortex Ship, you begin to rapidly learn how much of your God-given Voice had been silenced and how much you HAD allowed someone else to do your thinking for you. Then, out of embarrassment and angst, you begin to be vocal about this to others (who may not be as far along as you in the detox process, or those who happen to be still within the vortex). Immediately a label is slapped on you like 'Offended' or 'Unforgiving' or 'Bitter'. Definitely you are amongst those who have lost their way or, as they say in religious circles, 'Backslidden'.
Today as Pakistan buries their leader, Benazir Bhutto, I can't help but ponder the path of escilation from shunning in the hallway to murder. Why do Benazir's murderers feel justified in taking her life just because she dared to stand up to their imposed oppression? And to what degree do religious and cult-like people feel the right to silence the voice of those who speak up for the helpless? How long before passionate followers of dictators or authorian type leaders take it upon themselves to snuff out the voice of the outspoken even to death? Even if not physical death, think of the many ways death to the outspoken occurs.
Unlike her murderers, Benazir Bhutto cared passionately for her people and not only spoke up for them but backed her words with political action. She was aware she may be martyered for resisting oppression just as her father was killed years earlier. She considered her advocacy her calling and she ultimately died because of it. Returning from political exile to her country to face her enemies for her people, one thing she didn't do-- She didn't allow the intimidation of tyranny to silence her voice. She risked all for the possibility of helping those who couldn't help themselves.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment